<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (7) TMI 2 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45656</link>
    <description>Import of scheduled goods by a person not authorised under the licence, and in breach of the licence conditions incorporated into the Import Trade Control Order, constitutes import contrary to statutory restrictions and attracts confiscation under customs law. Refusal to allow cross-examination of a witness did not invalidate the confiscation where the statement had been supplied and no decisive disputed fact depended on such testing. A passing reference to alleged illegal activities of a third party also did not vitiate the order because the confiscation rested on the illegality of the import itself and no prejudice was shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:57:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (7) TMI 2 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45656</link>
      <description>Import of scheduled goods by a person not authorised under the licence, and in breach of the licence conditions incorporated into the Import Trade Control Order, constitutes import contrary to statutory restrictions and attracts confiscation under customs law. Refusal to allow cross-examination of a witness did not invalidate the confiscation where the statement had been supplied and no decisive disputed fact depended on such testing. A passing reference to alleged illegal activities of a third party also did not vitiate the order because the confiscation rested on the illegality of the import itself and no prejudice was shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>