<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 483 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776296</link>
    <description>The HC quashed and set aside the Magistrate&#039;s orders dated 06.12.2024 due to procedural irregularities in handling the accused&#039;s examination under Section 315 Cr.P.C. The Magistrate failed to obtain a written request from the accused to be examined as a witness and improperly granted adjournments despite the accused&#039;s absence, violating principles under Section 145 of the NI Act. The matter was remanded with directions that the accused must file a written application to act as a witness, after which the Magistrate shall allow oral evidence and consider documentary evidence only upon proper justification. Further evidence through other witnesses requires the Magistrate&#039;s discretion based on the defense raised. The case is restored to the stage for compliance with these procedures, ensuring adherence to natural justice and statutory mandates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 15:23:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 483 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776296</link>
      <description>The HC quashed and set aside the Magistrate&#039;s orders dated 06.12.2024 due to procedural irregularities in handling the accused&#039;s examination under Section 315 Cr.P.C. The Magistrate failed to obtain a written request from the accused to be examined as a witness and improperly granted adjournments despite the accused&#039;s absence, violating principles under Section 145 of the NI Act. The matter was remanded with directions that the accused must file a written application to act as a witness, after which the Magistrate shall allow oral evidence and consider documentary evidence only upon proper justification. Further evidence through other witnesses requires the Magistrate&#039;s discretion based on the defense raised. The case is restored to the stage for compliance with these procedures, ensuring adherence to natural justice and statutory mandates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>