<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (11) TMI 44 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45654</link>
    <description>The High Court found the confiscation of seized silver bricks and coins of Nepalese origin unsustainable due to lack of evidence supporting the claim. Additionally, the Court held that the seized silver coins with less than 40% silver content by weight but more than 40% by value were protected by Government Orders 57 and 58 of 1968, leading to the quashing of confiscation orders and directing the return of the seized items to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:50:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (11) TMI 44 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45654</link>
      <description>The High Court found the confiscation of seized silver bricks and coins of Nepalese origin unsustainable due to lack of evidence supporting the claim. Additionally, the Court held that the seized silver coins with less than 40% silver content by weight but more than 40% by value were protected by Government Orders 57 and 58 of 1968, leading to the quashing of confiscation orders and directing the return of the seized items to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>