https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45653 A person asserting ownership over seized customs goods may participate in the enquiry in his own right, without being compelled to act through the consignor. The Court also kept open the statutory objection that notice under the Customs Act was not served within six months from seizure, leaving that contention available to be raised according to law. The practical effect was that the petitioner was allowed to join the customs proceedings on the basis of his claimed ownership, while the separate challenge concerning notice and return of the goods was not foreclosed. en-us Thu, 19 Jul 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:48:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45653 A person asserting ownership over seized customs goods may participate in the enquiry in his own right, without being compelled to act through the consignor. The Court also kept open the statutory objection that notice under the Customs Act was not served within six months from seizure, leaving that contention available to be raised according to law. The practical effect was that the petitioner was allowed to join the customs proceedings on the basis of his claimed ownership, while the separate challenge concerning notice and return of the goods was not foreclosed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 19 Jul 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45653