<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 501 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776314</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Kolkata set aside the service tax demand of Rs. 28,19,194/- on the construction of a technician studio for the State PWD, holding that the studio&#039;s use for promoting state art and culture qualifies it for exemption under Notification 25/2012-ST, Sl. Nos. 12(a) and 12(c)(iii). The extended period of limitation and penalty were denied as the appellant did not suppress information. Additionally, the demand of Rs. 52,99,258/- on construction of the Exploration Hall in Science City was upheld as exempt under the same notification and relevant circulars, given the educational and cultural nature of the project. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected and the appellant&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 14:27:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 501 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776314</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Kolkata set aside the service tax demand of Rs. 28,19,194/- on the construction of a technician studio for the State PWD, holding that the studio&#039;s use for promoting state art and culture qualifies it for exemption under Notification 25/2012-ST, Sl. Nos. 12(a) and 12(c)(iii). The extended period of limitation and penalty were denied as the appellant did not suppress information. Additionally, the demand of Rs. 52,99,258/- on construction of the Exploration Hall in Science City was upheld as exempt under the same notification and relevant circulars, given the educational and cultural nature of the project. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected and the appellant&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>