<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 506 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776319</link>
    <description>The NCLAT held that the appeal was not maintainable as the appellants, suspended directors of the corporate debtor, were duly served via email and post using addresses from the MCA database. The tribunal&#039;s findings that the appellants did not cooperate with the IRP/RP/Liquidator and failed to provide statutory records were upheld. The court noted that the appellants appeared before the criminal court following prosecution initiated on the RP&#039;s complaint, indicating the appeal was primarily a defensive tactic. There was no reason to disturb the tribunal&#039;s observations justifying the corporate debtor&#039;s dissolution. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed with no interference in the impugned judgment or its observations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 05:20:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 506 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776319</link>
      <description>The NCLAT held that the appeal was not maintainable as the appellants, suspended directors of the corporate debtor, were duly served via email and post using addresses from the MCA database. The tribunal&#039;s findings that the appellants did not cooperate with the IRP/RP/Liquidator and failed to provide statutory records were upheld. The court noted that the appellants appeared before the criminal court following prosecution initiated on the RP&#039;s complaint, indicating the appeal was primarily a defensive tactic. There was no reason to disturb the tribunal&#039;s observations justifying the corporate debtor&#039;s dissolution. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed with no interference in the impugned judgment or its observations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>