https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776320 A plaint-rejection challenge is assessed on the plaint averments and the principal relief claimed, and a civil court's jurisdiction is excluded only by a clear statutory bar. Want of notice under Section 80 CPC was treated as a formal defect that barred the suit unless cured, but it did not destroy the cause of action and a fresh suit could follow. The suit was not barred by SARFAESI Section 34, winding up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956, or an unapproved insolvency resolution plan, because the claim was for damages against third parties and the insolvency moratorium applied to suits against the corporate debtor. Authority defects in verification did not justify partial rejection of the plaint. en-us Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Aug 2025 05:20:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776320 A plaint-rejection challenge is assessed on the plaint averments and the principal relief claimed, and a civil court's jurisdiction is excluded only by a clear statutory bar. Want of notice under Section 80 CPC was treated as a formal defect that barred the suit unless cured, but it did not destroy the cause of action and a fresh suit could follow. The suit was not barred by SARFAESI Section 34, winding up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956, or an unapproved insolvency resolution plan, because the claim was for damages against third parties and the insolvency moratorium applied to suits against the corporate debtor. Authority defects in verification did not justify partial rejection of the plaint. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776320