<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 554 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776367</link>
    <description>Where a dispute involves mixed questions of fact and law better examined by the competent authority, the writ court may remit the matter for fresh adjudication after hearing the parties. Applying that approach, the High Court sent the matter back for reconsideration on factual and legal aspects, and the impugned order and recovery notice were set aside in view of the remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 05:20:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 554 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776367</link>
      <description>Where a dispute involves mixed questions of fact and law better examined by the competent authority, the writ court may remit the matter for fresh adjudication after hearing the parties. Applying that approach, the High Court sent the matter back for reconsideration on factual and legal aspects, and the impugned order and recovery notice were set aside in view of the remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>