https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776373 The HC rejected the respondents' appeal based on limitation but found the cancellation of GST registration flawed due to non-application of mind and violation of natural justice principles, as the petitioner's reply was not considered. The cancellation order dated 12.09.2022 was held to be non-speaking and defective. The HC set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the Superintendent to reconsider the petitioner's contentions afresh, directing completion of proceedings within three months. The petition was allowed by way of remand. en-us Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Aug 2025 05:20:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776373 The HC rejected the respondents' appeal based on limitation but found the cancellation of GST registration flawed due to non-application of mind and violation of natural justice principles, as the petitioner's reply was not considered. The cancellation order dated 12.09.2022 was held to be non-speaking and defective. The HC set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the Superintendent to reconsider the petitioner's contentions afresh, directing completion of proceedings within three months. The petition was allowed by way of remand. Case-Laws GST Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776373