<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Delhi HC refuses interim relief to &#039;Drishyam 2&#039; producer in fraud case</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=51880</link>
    <description>Challenge to the validity of an FIR alleging cheating and criminal conspiracy in a film-rights investment transaction; the petitioner sought quashing of the FIR lodged by the Economic Offence Wing on grounds of reputational harm and risk of custodial interrogation. The court declined interim intervention, observing the investigation was at a preliminary stage and the petitioner was cooperating with authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 21:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 21:16:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Delhi HC refuses interim relief to &#039;Drishyam 2&#039; producer in fraud case</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=51880</link>
      <description>Challenge to the validity of an FIR alleging cheating and criminal conspiracy in a film-rights investment transaction; the petitioner sought quashing of the FIR lodged by the Economic Offence Wing on grounds of reputational harm and risk of custodial interrogation. The court declined interim intervention, observing the investigation was at a preliminary stage and the petitioner was cooperating with authorities.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 21:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=51880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>