<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1490 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463117</link>
    <description>Judicial review of legislative privilege is available where a suspension of elected members involves gross illegality, irrationality, lack of jurisdiction, mala fides, violation of natural justice, or infringement of fundamental rights. A disciplinary measure aimed at restoring order in the House must remain temporary and proportionate; a suspension extending beyond the remainder of the relevant Session becomes punitive and unconstitutional, particularly where it deprives a constituency of representation. The Court also held that a drastic House resolution cannot be sustained when it departs from the graded disciplinary framework and is imposed without a meaningful opportunity to be heard. The suspension was therefore ineffective beyond the remainder of the Session.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 20:34:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1490 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463117</link>
      <description>Judicial review of legislative privilege is available where a suspension of elected members involves gross illegality, irrationality, lack of jurisdiction, mala fides, violation of natural justice, or infringement of fundamental rights. A disciplinary measure aimed at restoring order in the House must remain temporary and proportionate; a suspension extending beyond the remainder of the relevant Session becomes punitive and unconstitutional, particularly where it deprives a constituency of representation. The Court also held that a drastic House resolution cannot be sustained when it departs from the graded disciplinary framework and is imposed without a meaningful opportunity to be heard. The suspension was therefore ineffective beyond the remainder of the Session.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>