https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45631 Mere filing of an SLP against a CEGAT order did not operate as a stay, because no specific stay had been obtained from the Supreme Court. The High Court held that the appellate order therefore continued to remain enforceable, and the direction requiring payment of duty in accordance with that order could not be treated as illegal. A communication that merely called for compliance with an existing appellate order did not create any independent liability beyond the operative order itself, so the assessee's challenge failed. en-us Wed, 02 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:48:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45631 Mere filing of an SLP against a CEGAT order did not operate as a stay, because no specific stay had been obtained from the Supreme Court. The High Court held that the appellate order therefore continued to remain enforceable, and the direction requiring payment of duty in accordance with that order could not be treated as illegal. A communication that merely called for compliance with an existing appellate order did not create any independent liability beyond the operative order itself, so the assessee's challenge failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 02 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45631