<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Income from ship operations taxable only in Singapore under Article 8 of India-Singapore DTAA, AO&#039;s addition set aside</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91349</link>
    <description>The ITAT held that income derived from operation of ships by a Singapore-based assessee is taxable exclusively in Singapore under Article 8 of the India-Singapore DTAA. The AO&#039;s invocation of Article 24 to restrict relief only to amounts actually received in Singapore was rejected, as the income is taxable on an accrual basis, not receipt basis, corroborated by a certificate from IRAS. The tribunal relied on precedent from a coordinate bench, which the AO failed to distinguish or appropriately consider. Consequently, the addition made by the AO on account of invoking Article 24 was set aside. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the AO was directed to delete the impugned addition, affirming the applicability of Article 8 benefits without limitation under Article 24 in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 08:00:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 08:00:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Income from ship operations taxable only in Singapore under Article 8 of India-Singapore DTAA, AO&#039;s addition set aside</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91349</link>
      <description>The ITAT held that income derived from operation of ships by a Singapore-based assessee is taxable exclusively in Singapore under Article 8 of the India-Singapore DTAA. The AO&#039;s invocation of Article 24 to restrict relief only to amounts actually received in Singapore was rejected, as the income is taxable on an accrual basis, not receipt basis, corroborated by a certificate from IRAS. The tribunal relied on precedent from a coordinate bench, which the AO failed to distinguish or appropriately consider. Consequently, the addition made by the AO on account of invoking Article 24 was set aside. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the AO was directed to delete the impugned addition, affirming the applicability of Article 8 benefits without limitation under Article 24 in this case.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 08:00:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>