<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 482 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776295</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication. The Court held that the SCN issued on 21st May 2024 and the subsequent reminder could not be invalidated solely because they were uploaded under the &#039;Additional Notices Tab&#039; on the GST portal. However, since the impugned notifications underlying the SCN are under challenge before the SC, and the order was passed without considering the petitioner&#039;s reply, the matter warranted reconsideration. The petitioner was directed to file replies within thirty days, and future hearing notices must be emailed in addition to portal upload. The petition was disposed by remand for adjudication in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 07:56:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 482 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776295</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication. The Court held that the SCN issued on 21st May 2024 and the subsequent reminder could not be invalidated solely because they were uploaded under the &#039;Additional Notices Tab&#039; on the GST portal. However, since the impugned notifications underlying the SCN are under challenge before the SC, and the order was passed without considering the petitioner&#039;s reply, the matter warranted reconsideration. The petitioner was directed to file replies within thirty days, and future hearing notices must be emailed in addition to portal upload. The petition was disposed by remand for adjudication in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>