<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 474 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776287</link>
    <description>A GST notice issued after search and seizure contemplated appearance either in person or through an authorised representative, so apprehension that arrest would necessarily follow non-appearance was not accepted. The petitioners were permitted to appear before the authority on the indicated date and to seek extension of time from the State authorities. The application was disposed of on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 07:05:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 474 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776287</link>
      <description>A GST notice issued after search and seizure contemplated appearance either in person or through an authorised representative, so apprehension that arrest would necessarily follow non-appearance was not accepted. The petitioners were permitted to appear before the authority on the indicated date and to seek extension of time from the State authorities. The application was disposed of on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>