<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 87 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45624</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Government of India&#039;s decision to reject the revision petition as time-barred under the Customs Act. It ruled that statutory provisions did not permit condonation of delays beyond the specified period, emphasizing strict adherence to the law without room for equitable considerations. The petitioner&#039;s plea for a liberal approach and inherent jurisdiction was dismissed, affirming the denial of the revision petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:33:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 87 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45624</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Government of India&#039;s decision to reject the revision petition as time-barred under the Customs Act. It ruled that statutory provisions did not permit condonation of delays beyond the specified period, emphasizing strict adherence to the law without room for equitable considerations. The petitioner&#039;s plea for a liberal approach and inherent jurisdiction was dismissed, affirming the denial of the revision petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>