<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 415 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776228</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the appeal challenging the denial of basic facilities to the NCLT Advocates Bar Association at the Kolkata Bench. It held that decisions regarding infrastructure and location of judicial forums fall within the executive&#039;s administrative discretion. The Court emphasized the doctrine of separation of powers, asserting judicial restraint in matters lacking demonstrable illegality or constitutional violations. While acknowledging the concerns about infrastructural deficiencies, the HC found no grounds to interfere with the executive&#039;s decision to relocate the NCLT, which was deemed appropriate and beneficial. The Court declined to substitute its judgment for that of the competent authorities and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 17:42:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 415 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776228</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the appeal challenging the denial of basic facilities to the NCLT Advocates Bar Association at the Kolkata Bench. It held that decisions regarding infrastructure and location of judicial forums fall within the executive&#039;s administrative discretion. The Court emphasized the doctrine of separation of powers, asserting judicial restraint in matters lacking demonstrable illegality or constitutional violations. While acknowledging the concerns about infrastructural deficiencies, the HC found no grounds to interfere with the executive&#039;s decision to relocate the NCLT, which was deemed appropriate and beneficial. The Court declined to substitute its judgment for that of the competent authorities and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>