https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776234 Duty paid under protest was treated as non-voluntary where the protest had not been vacated by any adverse speaking order, so the refund claim was not barred by limitation under section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court further upheld entitlement to interest on the refunded amount, rejecting the revenue's objection that interest was not payable. The refund order was sustained and the assessee's claim for refund with interest was accepted. en-us Sat, 02 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Aug 2025 07:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776234 Duty paid under protest was treated as non-voluntary where the protest had not been vacated by any adverse speaking order, so the refund claim was not barred by limitation under section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court further upheld entitlement to interest on the refunded amount, rejecting the revenue's objection that interest was not payable. The refund order was sustained and the assessee's claim for refund with interest was accepted. Case-Laws Customs Sat, 02 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776234