<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 423 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776236</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s admission of the assessee&#039;s additional ground regarding non-taxability of the waiver of a working capital loan, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s objection that such claim was not made in the original or revised return. Relying on Supreme Court precedents, the tribunal confirmed that additional claims can be raised before the ITAT. The waiver amount, credited as income and offered to tax, was held not taxable under Section 41(1) as it was not a trading liability. Further, Section 28(iv) was deemed inapplicable since the waiver constituted a cash receipt, not a non-monetary business benefit. The decision aligned with the Bombay HC ruling in Essar Shipping Ltd., concluding the waiver amount could not be taxed under Section 28(iv). Grounds raised by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 07:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 423 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776236</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s admission of the assessee&#039;s additional ground regarding non-taxability of the waiver of a working capital loan, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s objection that such claim was not made in the original or revised return. Relying on Supreme Court precedents, the tribunal confirmed that additional claims can be raised before the ITAT. The waiver amount, credited as income and offered to tax, was held not taxable under Section 41(1) as it was not a trading liability. Further, Section 28(iv) was deemed inapplicable since the waiver constituted a cash receipt, not a non-monetary business benefit. The decision aligned with the Bombay HC ruling in Essar Shipping Ltd., concluding the waiver amount could not be taxed under Section 28(iv). Grounds raised by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>