<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 462 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776275</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the ex parte cancellation order dated 21.02.2025 and remanded the matter to the assessing authority. The petitioner, who had ceased business before the cancellation, was not personally served with the show cause notice. The petitioner is granted three weeks to respond to the SCN issued on 28.11.2024. The authority must provide a hearing opportunity before passing a fresh order. The petition was allowed by way of remand, emphasizing adherence to natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 07:04:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 462 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776275</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the ex parte cancellation order dated 21.02.2025 and remanded the matter to the assessing authority. The petitioner, who had ceased business before the cancellation, was not personally served with the show cause notice. The petitioner is granted three weeks to respond to the SCN issued on 28.11.2024. The authority must provide a hearing opportunity before passing a fresh order. The petition was allowed by way of remand, emphasizing adherence to natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>