<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 468 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776281</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging cancellation of GST registration was met with a preliminary objection that an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the CGST law. No merits adjudication was undertaken on the cancellation order, as the matter was dealt with on maintainability and alternative remedy. The petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file the statutory appellate remedy within one week, and any appeal so filed was directed to be decided expeditiously.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 07:04:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 468 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776281</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging cancellation of GST registration was met with a preliminary objection that an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the CGST law. No merits adjudication was undertaken on the cancellation order, as the matter was dealt with on maintainability and alternative remedy. The petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file the statutory appellate remedy within one week, and any appeal so filed was directed to be decided expeditiously.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>