https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463101 The HC exercised supervisory and writ jurisdiction after finding contradictory tribunal orders in the same controversy. Without deciding the merits of entitlement to Cenvat credit on sugar cess, it held that the inconsistency in the tribunal's conclusions justified interference. The impugned order was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for reconsideration. en-us Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Aug 2025 22:01:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463101 The HC exercised supervisory and writ jurisdiction after finding contradictory tribunal orders in the same controversy. Without deciding the merits of entitlement to Cenvat credit on sugar cess, it held that the inconsistency in the tribunal's conclusions justified interference. The impugned order was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for reconsideration. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463101