<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1788 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463103</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Mumbai held that services provided electronically to a parent company in the Netherlands qualify as export of services under Rule 4(a) of the Place of Provision of Service Rules, 2012, as the goods involvement requirement was not met. Consequently, the appellants were entitled to claim a refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit on input services used for such export. The tribunal set aside the impugned order rejecting the refund and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 22:01:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1788 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463103</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Mumbai held that services provided electronically to a parent company in the Netherlands qualify as export of services under Rule 4(a) of the Place of Provision of Service Rules, 2012, as the goods involvement requirement was not met. Consequently, the appellants were entitled to claim a refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit on input services used for such export. The tribunal set aside the impugned order rejecting the refund and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>