<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (7) TMI 56 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45615</link>
    <description>Hosiery banyans were held not to fall within the expression &quot;cotton fabrics&quot; for purposes of the sales tax exemption in Item 23 of Schedule III of the 1 July 1959 notification. The text of the exemption scheme, read with later notifications, showed a separate exemption for hosiery cloth sold in lengths and a later separate exemption for cotton hosiery goods, indicating that hosiery goods were not covered by the original general description. The article treats the Central Excises definition as too narrow to extend the exemption to hosiery banyans, which were distinct manufactured articles. Exemption provisions were therefore to be construed strictly in their statutory context.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (7) TMI 56 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45615</link>
      <description>Hosiery banyans were held not to fall within the expression &quot;cotton fabrics&quot; for purposes of the sales tax exemption in Item 23 of Schedule III of the 1 July 1959 notification. The text of the exemption scheme, read with later notifications, showed a separate exemption for hosiery cloth sold in lengths and a later separate exemption for cotton hosiery goods, indicating that hosiery goods were not covered by the original general description. The article treats the Central Excises definition as too narrow to extend the exemption to hosiery banyans, which were distinct manufactured articles. Exemption provisions were therefore to be construed strictly in their statutory context.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>