<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 2052 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463112</link>
    <description>Deduction under Section 80HHC was held computable without first reducing the deduction under Section 80IB, applying binding precedent in favour of the assessee. Scrap sale proceeds were also held not to form part of total turnover for Section 80HHC computation, again following precedent and favouring the assessee. Both substantial questions of law were answered against the Revenue, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 22:01:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 2052 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463112</link>
      <description>Deduction under Section 80HHC was held computable without first reducing the deduction under Section 80IB, applying binding precedent in favour of the assessee. Scrap sale proceeds were also held not to form part of total turnover for Section 80HHC computation, again following precedent and favouring the assessee. Both substantial questions of law were answered against the Revenue, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>