<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (9) TMI 75 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45612</link>
    <description>The Court held that the Additional Collector&#039;s interpretation of &quot;silver bullion&quot; was unjustified. The seized articles were not considered &quot;silver bullion&quot; in trade, as evidenced by expert testimony. The confiscation order and penalties imposed were set aside, and the seized articles were directed to be returned to the Petitioners. The Income Tax Department was allowed to proceed with tax recovery actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:46:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (9) TMI 75 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45612</link>
      <description>The Court held that the Additional Collector&#039;s interpretation of &quot;silver bullion&quot; was unjustified. The seized articles were not considered &quot;silver bullion&quot; in trade, as evidenced by expert testimony. The confiscation order and penalties imposed were set aside, and the seized articles were directed to be returned to the Petitioners. The Income Tax Department was allowed to proceed with tax recovery actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>