https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45605 Interference with an existing restraint order was treated as potential contempt, but the proceedings did not continue once the respondents tendered an unqualified apology. The Court accepted that apology and discharged the contempt notice, indicating that acceptance of an unqualified apology may justify termination of contempt action despite alleged interference with the Court's earlier order. en-us Fri, 15 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:24:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45605 Interference with an existing restraint order was treated as potential contempt, but the proceedings did not continue once the respondents tendered an unqualified apology. The Court accepted that apology and discharged the contempt notice, indicating that acceptance of an unqualified apology may justify termination of contempt action despite alleged interference with the Court's earlier order. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 15 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45605