https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776138 In revision, the HC will not disturb concurrent findings of conviction and sentence unless they are perverse, grossly erroneous, or jurisdictionally flawed, and no such interference was justified here. A cheque issued as security still attracts Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 if a legally enforceable liability exists on the date of presentation; once issuance and signature are admitted, the presumptions under Sections 118(a) and 139 arise and are not rebutted by a bare Section 313 CrPC statement without defence evidence. Dishonour for insufficient funds, valid service of notice, and subsisting liability were proved, so the conviction and sentence were upheld. en-us Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:19:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776138 In revision, the HC will not disturb concurrent findings of conviction and sentence unless they are perverse, grossly erroneous, or jurisdictionally flawed, and no such interference was justified here. A cheque issued as security still attracts Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 if a legally enforceable liability exists on the date of presentation; once issuance and signature are admitted, the presumptions under Sections 118(a) and 139 arise and are not rebutted by a bare Section 313 CrPC statement without defence evidence. Dishonour for insufficient funds, valid service of notice, and subsisting liability were proved, so the conviction and sentence were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776138