<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 332 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776145</link>
    <description>MODVAT credit was denied where the goods were said to have been bought on a high sea sale basis, but the Bills of Entry remained in the original importer&#039;s name and the transaction was not proved by supporting customs documents. The Court noted that admissible credit under the MODVAT regime depends on proper duty-paying documents and a valid transfer of title, including endorsement of the Bill of Entry or compliance with customs formalities by the buyer. As the record showed payment of customs duty and port charges by the original importers and no genuine transfer was established, the disallowance of credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:19:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 332 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776145</link>
      <description>MODVAT credit was denied where the goods were said to have been bought on a high sea sale basis, but the Bills of Entry remained in the original importer&#039;s name and the transaction was not proved by supporting customs documents. The Court noted that admissible credit under the MODVAT regime depends on proper duty-paying documents and a valid transfer of title, including endorsement of the Bill of Entry or compliance with customs formalities by the buyer. As the record showed payment of customs duty and port charges by the original importers and no genuine transfer was established, the disallowance of credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>