<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 350 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776163</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chandigarh upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order disallowing unexplained cash deposits and large credit entries under section 68. The tribunal found that the sale of agricultural land and subsequent bank transactions involving withdrawals and re-deposits, exceeding the deposited amount, were properly scrutinized. Consequently, the unexplained nature of the entries was confirmed, and the addition was justified. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:19:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 350 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776163</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chandigarh upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order disallowing unexplained cash deposits and large credit entries under section 68. The tribunal found that the sale of agricultural land and subsequent bank transactions involving withdrawals and re-deposits, exceeding the deposited amount, were properly scrutinized. Consequently, the unexplained nature of the entries was confirmed, and the addition was justified. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>