<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 363 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776176</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the deletion of protective and substantive additions made under section 69 against the assessee. The CIT(A) had deleted the protective addition after sustaining the substantive addition against a third party post-search. However, the Delhi HC later quashed the substantive addition against the third party due to lack of incriminating evidence. Given the identical material basis, the ITAT held that the additions against the assessee could not stand. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:19:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 363 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776176</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the deletion of protective and substantive additions made under section 69 against the assessee. The CIT(A) had deleted the protective addition after sustaining the substantive addition against a third party post-search. However, the Delhi HC later quashed the substantive addition against the third party due to lack of incriminating evidence. Given the identical material basis, the ITAT held that the additions against the assessee could not stand. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>