<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 371 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776184</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order allowing the assessee to set off Long-Term Capital Loss on sale of unlisted shares against Long-Term Capital Gain from a slump sale under section 50B. The tribunal found the transactions genuine, supported by audited financials, share certificates, CA valuation reports, and proper banking channels. There was no evidence of collusion, accommodation entries, or fictitious transactions. The loss arose from bona fide commercial decisions based on updated financial data and business prospects. The Revenue&#039;s addition of Rs. 24 crores was held unjustified and deleted. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:19:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 371 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776184</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order allowing the assessee to set off Long-Term Capital Loss on sale of unlisted shares against Long-Term Capital Gain from a slump sale under section 50B. The tribunal found the transactions genuine, supported by audited financials, share certificates, CA valuation reports, and proper banking channels. There was no evidence of collusion, accommodation entries, or fictitious transactions. The loss arose from bona fide commercial decisions based on updated financial data and business prospects. The Revenue&#039;s addition of Rs. 24 crores was held unjustified and deleted. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>