<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 390 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776203</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition challenging the validity of reassessment proceedings under section 148A(d) due to unexplained share transactions. The HC had held that the AO failed to justify reopening the assessment, relying solely on the petitioner&#039;s failure to furnish the Sales and Purchase Register. The SC declined to condone the delay in filing the petition and refused to entertain it on merits, thereby upholding the HC&#039;s decision and dismissing the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:19:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 390 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776203</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition challenging the validity of reassessment proceedings under section 148A(d) due to unexplained share transactions. The HC had held that the AO failed to justify reopening the assessment, relying solely on the petitioner&#039;s failure to furnish the Sales and Purchase Register. The SC declined to condone the delay in filing the petition and refused to entertain it on merits, thereby upholding the HC&#039;s decision and dismissing the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>