<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 393 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776206</link>
    <description>The HC condoned a 51-day delay in filing the appeal, accepting the petitioner&#039;s explanation of time taken to gather documents, reconcile records, and obtain legal advice as genuine. The appeal was restored on the file of the 2nd respondent subject to the petitioner paying Rs. 5,000 to the specified hospital account within two weeks. The petition was disposed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:19:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 393 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776206</link>
      <description>The HC condoned a 51-day delay in filing the appeal, accepting the petitioner&#039;s explanation of time taken to gather documents, reconcile records, and obtain legal advice as genuine. The appeal was restored on the file of the 2nd respondent subject to the petitioner paying Rs. 5,000 to the specified hospital account within two weeks. The petition was disposed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>