https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776209 Personal hearing was fixed on multiple dates and several noticees participated, but the petitioner did not avail the opportunity; on that basis, no breach of natural justice was found. Because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the CGST Act and the demand had already been deposited under protest, the writ court declined interference and relegated the petitioner to the appellate remedy. The issue of delay in uploading the order was left open to be raised before the appellate authority. en-us Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:19:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776209 Personal hearing was fixed on multiple dates and several noticees participated, but the petitioner did not avail the opportunity; on that basis, no breach of natural justice was found. Because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the CGST Act and the demand had already been deposited under protest, the writ court declined interference and relegated the petitioner to the appellate remedy. The issue of delay in uploading the order was left open to be raised before the appellate authority. Case-Laws GST Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776209