https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776212 The HC found that the petitioner was denied the mandatory three personal hearings under the CGST Act and was unaware of the Show Cause Notice and impugned order. A demand of Rs. 88,474/- was raised without affording the petitioner an opportunity to reply or be heard. Exercising writ jurisdiction, the HC extended the time for filing the appeal until 31 August 2025 with the requisite pre-deposit. If filed within this period, the appeal will not be dismissed as time-barred and will be decided on merits. The petitioner may present its case before the Appellate Authority, which must consider it on its own merits. The petition was disposed of accordingly. en-us Tue, 29 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:19:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776212 The HC found that the petitioner was denied the mandatory three personal hearings under the CGST Act and was unaware of the Show Cause Notice and impugned order. A demand of Rs. 88,474/- was raised without affording the petitioner an opportunity to reply or be heard. Exercising writ jurisdiction, the HC extended the time for filing the appeal until 31 August 2025 with the requisite pre-deposit. If filed within this period, the appeal will not be dismissed as time-barred and will be decided on merits. The petitioner may present its case before the Appellate Authority, which must consider it on its own merits. The petition was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws GST Tue, 29 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776212