<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1515 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463095</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the ex parte cancellation of the petitioner&#039;s GST registration, finding a violation of natural justice as no personal notice was served and the petitioner had ceased business before the cancellation date. The matter was remanded to the assessing authority for fresh consideration. The petitioner was allowed 15 days to respond to the show cause notice, and the authority was directed to provide a hearing before passing a new order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 20:49:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1515 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463095</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the ex parte cancellation of the petitioner&#039;s GST registration, finding a violation of natural justice as no personal notice was served and the petitioner had ceased business before the cancellation date. The matter was remanded to the assessing authority for fresh consideration. The petitioner was allowed 15 days to respond to the show cause notice, and the authority was directed to provide a hearing before passing a new order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>