<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (3) TMI 60 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45578</link>
    <description>Section 11 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 did not authorise the Superintendent to make unilateral debit entries in the assessee&#039;s account-current; the statutory scheme required assessment under the rules and recovery only through the prescribed machinery, so the debit entries were quashed. The manufacturer-company&#039;s different factories were not separate legal persons for excise liability, so balances maintained across its units could be adjusted against the demand relating to the Chemical Factory; that adjustment was upheld. The writ therefore succeeded only on the issue of unauthorised debit entries, while recovery in accordance with law remained open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:55:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (3) TMI 60 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45578</link>
      <description>Section 11 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 did not authorise the Superintendent to make unilateral debit entries in the assessee&#039;s account-current; the statutory scheme required assessment under the rules and recovery only through the prescribed machinery, so the debit entries were quashed. The manufacturer-company&#039;s different factories were not separate legal persons for excise liability, so balances maintained across its units could be adjusted against the demand relating to the Chemical Factory; that adjustment was upheld. The writ therefore succeeded only on the issue of unauthorised debit entries, while recovery in accordance with law remained open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>