<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (12) TMI 30 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45571</link>
    <description>The High Court of Judicature at Madras ruled in favor of the Collector of Central Excise in an appeal regarding the labeling of pharmaceutical products under the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. The court held that the respondent&#039;s labeling practices, including distinctive elements like the dealer&#039;s name, signature, and photograph, established a trade connection, justifying the levy sought by the Collector. The judgment emphasized the application of the Act&#039;s provisions to the respondent&#039;s repackaging and marketing activities, ultimately allowing the appeal and discharging the writ of prohibition granted to the company proprietor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:38:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (12) TMI 30 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45571</link>
      <description>The High Court of Judicature at Madras ruled in favor of the Collector of Central Excise in an appeal regarding the labeling of pharmaceutical products under the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. The court held that the respondent&#039;s labeling practices, including distinctive elements like the dealer&#039;s name, signature, and photograph, established a trade connection, justifying the levy sought by the Collector. The judgment emphasized the application of the Act&#039;s provisions to the respondent&#039;s repackaging and marketing activities, ultimately allowing the appeal and discharging the writ of prohibition granted to the company proprietor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>