<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 252 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776065</link>
    <description>Elevators and conveyors used in rice mill machinery were treated as classifiable under Chapter Heading 8437, with nil duty during the relevant period, following earlier Tribunal rulings upheld by the Supreme Court and departmental acceptance of that position. Parboiling and drying plants were also treated as classifiable under Chapter Heading 8437 because a beneficial departmental circular in force during the relevant period bound departmental officers. On limitation, the extended period was held unavailable because conflicting views on classification did not by themselves establish suppression, fraud, or wilful misstatement, so the demand failed on merits and limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 13:06:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 252 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776065</link>
      <description>Elevators and conveyors used in rice mill machinery were treated as classifiable under Chapter Heading 8437, with nil duty during the relevant period, following earlier Tribunal rulings upheld by the Supreme Court and departmental acceptance of that position. Parboiling and drying plants were also treated as classifiable under Chapter Heading 8437 because a beneficial departmental circular in force during the relevant period bound departmental officers. On limitation, the extended period was held unavailable because conflicting views on classification did not by themselves establish suppression, fraud, or wilful misstatement, so the demand failed on merits and limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>