https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776068 The CESTAT Bangalore held that fees received by the appellant as a player fee for playing cricket do not qualify as Business Auxiliary Services and are not taxable under that category. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal affirmed that such fees pertain solely to playing services and cannot be treated as promotional activities. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside. en-us Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Aug 2025 07:54:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776068 The CESTAT Bangalore held that fees received by the appellant as a player fee for playing cricket do not qualify as Business Auxiliary Services and are not taxable under that category. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal affirmed that such fees pertain solely to playing services and cannot be treated as promotional activities. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776068