<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 256 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776069</link>
    <description>The AT under SAFEMA at New Delhi set aside the impugned order in FEMA proceedings, holding that the foreign-origin document in German relied upon by the Directorate was inadmissible due to lack of proper authentication as required by law. The appellants denied knowledge of the document, the foreign bank account, and their involvement in the trust or foreign exchange transactions, which was not contradicted by the Directorate. The tribunal affirmed the principle that foreign documents must be duly authenticated to be admissible, referencing prior precedent. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the impugned order was quashed for being without merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 07:54:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 256 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776069</link>
      <description>The AT under SAFEMA at New Delhi set aside the impugned order in FEMA proceedings, holding that the foreign-origin document in German relied upon by the Directorate was inadmissible due to lack of proper authentication as required by law. The appellants denied knowledge of the document, the foreign bank account, and their involvement in the trust or foreign exchange transactions, which was not contradicted by the Directorate. The tribunal affirmed the principle that foreign documents must be duly authenticated to be admissible, referencing prior precedent. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the impugned order was quashed for being without merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>