<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 257 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776070</link>
    <description>The HC held that since all parties, including the principal, had agreed to pay the penalty without admitting liability, the appeals filed by the Union were dismissed. The appellant, seeking to follow the same approach, was allowed to do so. The court set aside the impugned order dated 4 July 2024, subject to the appellant donating Rs. 1.05 crores to the Prime Minister&#039;s Relief Fund within eight weeks and filing proof of payment with advance notice to the respondent&#039;s counsel.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 07:54:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 257 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776070</link>
      <description>The HC held that since all parties, including the principal, had agreed to pay the penalty without admitting liability, the appeals filed by the Union were dismissed. The appellant, seeking to follow the same approach, was allowed to do so. The court set aside the impugned order dated 4 July 2024, subject to the appellant donating Rs. 1.05 crores to the Prime Minister&#039;s Relief Fund within eight weeks and filing proof of payment with advance notice to the respondent&#039;s counsel.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>