<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 263 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776076</link>
    <description>The operational creditor&#039;s claim was examined and upheld by the adjudicating authority while admitting the insolvency petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The NCLAT affirmed that finding and declined to interfere with the order. The Supreme Court found no good ground to disturb the impugned judgment and noted that the civil appeal had been dismissed as withdrawn. The appeal was accordingly dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 07:54:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 263 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776076</link>
      <description>The operational creditor&#039;s claim was examined and upheld by the adjudicating authority while admitting the insolvency petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The NCLAT affirmed that finding and declined to interfere with the order. The Supreme Court found no good ground to disturb the impugned judgment and noted that the civil appeal had been dismissed as withdrawn. The appeal was accordingly dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>