<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 278 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776091</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai held that the reopening of assessment under section 147 beyond four years was invalid as the reasons for reopening were based on the same material already available during the original assessment under section 143(3). The AO did not possess any fresh tangible evidence to justify reopening, making it a mere change of opinion, which is impermissible under established precedent. Consequently, the reopening was quashed and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 07:54:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 278 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776091</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai held that the reopening of assessment under section 147 beyond four years was invalid as the reasons for reopening were based on the same material already available during the original assessment under section 143(3). The AO did not possess any fresh tangible evidence to justify reopening, making it a mere change of opinion, which is impermissible under established precedent. Consequently, the reopening was quashed and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>