<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 287 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776100</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai remanded the marketing service fee issue to the TPO to accept the assessee&#039;s TNMM approach using foreign AEs as comparables after verifying additional evidence. The upward interest adjustment on trade receivables was deleted as the assessee did not charge interest on delayed payments from both AEs and non-AEs. The corporate guarantee fee adjustment was restricted to 0.5% of the utilized amount (AED 3.1 million), not the sanctioned limit, as no cost was incurred. Depreciation on ATM machines was allowed at 40% instead of 15%. The gratuity deduction disallowance was reversed since it pertained to reversal of excess provision. Bad debts written off were allowed as irrecoverable per settled law. Additional loss claims and ATM site rent deductions were remitted to the AO for verification and decision in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 07:54:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 287 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776100</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai remanded the marketing service fee issue to the TPO to accept the assessee&#039;s TNMM approach using foreign AEs as comparables after verifying additional evidence. The upward interest adjustment on trade receivables was deleted as the assessee did not charge interest on delayed payments from both AEs and non-AEs. The corporate guarantee fee adjustment was restricted to 0.5% of the utilized amount (AED 3.1 million), not the sanctioned limit, as no cost was incurred. Depreciation on ATM machines was allowed at 40% instead of 15%. The gratuity deduction disallowance was reversed since it pertained to reversal of excess provision. Bad debts written off were allowed as irrecoverable per settled law. Additional loss claims and ATM site rent deductions were remitted to the AO for verification and decision in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>