<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 292 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776105</link>
    <description>The ITAT Agra upheld the AO&#039;s addition under section 68, denying exemption under section 10(38) for alleged bogus capital gains. The assessee failed to explain the substantial 33-fold appreciation in share price within a short period despite transactions occurring through recognized stock exchanges and DEMAT accounts. The tribunal found no new facts or submissions warranting deviation from the AO and CIT(A) findings, sustaining the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 07:54:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 292 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776105</link>
      <description>The ITAT Agra upheld the AO&#039;s addition under section 68, denying exemption under section 10(38) for alleged bogus capital gains. The assessee failed to explain the substantial 33-fold appreciation in share price within a short period despite transactions occurring through recognized stock exchanges and DEMAT accounts. The tribunal found no new facts or submissions warranting deviation from the AO and CIT(A) findings, sustaining the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>