<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 309 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776122</link>
    <description>The HC held that delay in challenging the cancellation of GST registration under Section 30 of the Act is condoned due to the complexity of the law and its impact on livelihood and state revenue. The petitioner was allowed three weeks to file an application for reconsideration along with all pending returns. The application must be decided within three weeks of filing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 07:54:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 309 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776122</link>
      <description>The HC held that delay in challenging the cancellation of GST registration under Section 30 of the Act is condoned due to the complexity of the law and its impact on livelihood and state revenue. The petitioner was allowed three weeks to file an application for reconsideration along with all pending returns. The application must be decided within three weeks of filing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>