https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45560 The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the Central Government's rejection of the revisional application. The court found that the revisional order lacked reasons, emphasizing the importance of providing reasons in quasi-judicial proceedings. The court directed the authority to reevaluate the application in accordance with the law, based on the lack of reasons provided in the original rejection. No costs were awarded in this judgment, which was also stated to govern a related case. en-us Wed, 17 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:16:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45560 The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the Central Government's rejection of the revisional application. The court found that the revisional order lacked reasons, emphasizing the importance of providing reasons in quasi-judicial proceedings. The court directed the authority to reevaluate the application in accordance with the law, based on the lack of reasons provided in the original rejection. No costs were awarded in this judgment, which was also stated to govern a related case. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 17 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45560