<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 312 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776125</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the petition seeking restoration of the petitioner&#039;s GST registration and quashing of the show cause notice for cancellation. The court found the petitioner negligent and unresponsive to multiple notices. It held that no writ jurisdiction interference was warranted and allowed the petitioner to apply for a fresh GST registration if desired. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 07:54:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 312 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776125</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the petition seeking restoration of the petitioner&#039;s GST registration and quashing of the show cause notice for cancellation. The court found the petitioner negligent and unresponsive to multiple notices. It held that no writ jurisdiction interference was warranted and allowed the petitioner to apply for a fresh GST registration if desired. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>